<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lindsell Marketing &#187; Paul Lindsell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/author/paul-lindsell/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com</link>
	<description>Your Content Engine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The dangers of tinkering</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/the-dangers-of-tinkering</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/the-dangers-of-tinkering#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindsell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We Think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So our beloved, recently elected, most esteemed, coalesced leaders are  doing something very important with Capital Gains Tax.  I thought that  we had left the period of pre-election posturing and were supposed to be  getting down to real policies to sort out the economic crisis.   Evidently not.  Do you know how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So our beloved, recently elected, most esteemed, coalesced leaders are  doing something very important with Capital Gains Tax.  I thought that  we had left the period of pre-election posturing and were supposed to be  getting down to real policies to sort out the economic crisis.   Evidently not.  Do you know how much CGT raises each year?  Around £3-4  billion.  So alter that by, say 10% (a politically acceptable change for  the electorate) and it might raise £300-400 million.  In the current  situation, that is a totally insignificant sum.  As <a href="http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/whats-new/spending-cuts-not-enough" target="_blank"><span style="color: #00ffff;"><strong>our survey amongst  UK financial managers</strong></span></a> shows, it&#8217;s income tax that has to rise if we are  to plug the enormous deficit gap.</p>
<p>The theme of tinkering around the edges can also be applied to today&#8217;s  marketers.  Look at the mirage that is e-marketing.  Sure, some works &#8211;  and Linked-in communities provide a very good example of that.  Yet time  after time, we find companies saving pennies on print and going totally  online.  It just doesn&#8217;t work.  There is a substantial proportion of the  business community &#8211; at least half by our reckoning &#8211; who say that they  NEVER respond to online or email marketing pieces.  What utter twit  would therefore save a couple of thousand on print and mail, in order to  studiously ignore half their target market who might represent a  potential market of several millions?  It just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>In business and in politics, it&#8217;s the people who can see the wood for  the tress who succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/the-dangers-of-tinkering/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For SMEs, it&#8217;s afterwards that matters</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/for-smes-its-afterwards-that-matters</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/for-smes-its-afterwards-that-matters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 10:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindsell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We Think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we Brits are all in the throes of having to make the dreadful choice when casting our votes this week.  Colleagues and clients across Europe and the US have been studiously telling us that there is either more definition or less corruption in the UK&#8217;s political options compared to their own home turf, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we Brits are all in the throes of having to make the dreadful choice when casting our votes this week.  Colleagues and clients across Europe and the US have been studiously telling us that there is either more definition or less corruption in the UK&#8217;s political options compared to their own home turf, and that we should stop moaning and just get on with it with good grace.  Point taken.</p>
<p>In fact, there are two issues that the successful party or coalition must address immediately and seriously.  First is the economic black hole of the UK public deficit (expected to be around £70bn once the temporary bank prop-up allowance is removed).  The other is giving small and medium-sized businesses proper recognition and a strong representation to government.</p>
<p>I believe that the existing small business organisations are frankly ineffective in forcefully carrying the SME lobby to parliament.  There is plenty of wooing of large firms by political parties, but only token recognition really being given to the 1.5 million firms that produce half the country&#8217;s revenues.  The Conservatives have pledged that 25% of government contracts would be awarded to small businesses.  The LibDems say they will force banks to lend more to small businesses.  Labour says it will provide £4bn in new venture capital for growth businesses.</p>
<p>All this is very well, but what pressure group is going to scrutinise government and lobby for real delivery on these promises?  In my personal view, certainly not the feeble organisations that currently claim to represent SME interests.</p>
<p>So with a new government, we need a new representative organisation to drive through SME issues.  Any volunteers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/for-smes-its-afterwards-that-matters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Special &#8211; Labour&#8217;s Bad for Business</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/election-special-labours-bad-for-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/election-special-labours-bad-for-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindsell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We Think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So election fever has begun in earnest today.  Given the way vulnerable seat boundaries now lie, it may well go to the wire on May 6th, with the Conservatives having more of a battle than they&#8217;d originally thought.  Personally, I won&#8217;t be deciding which way to vote until the last minute.  But Labour certainly seem to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So election fever has begun in earnest today.  Given the way vulnerable seat boundaries now lie, it may well go to the wire on May 6th, with the Conservatives having more of a battle than they&#8217;d originally thought.  Personally, I won&#8217;t be deciding which way to vote until the last minute.  But Labour certainly seem to have missed a trick in one respect &#8211; the business vote.  We&#8217;ll are in the process of launching a new piece of national business research which firmly shows a huge polarity between the Conservatives and Labour when it comes to steering the nation towards economic recovery.  The Tories are trusted to do so by twice as many businesses as Labour, who are languishing only a couple of points ahead of the LibDems.  This finding should be disseminated amongst consumer opinion watchers &#8211; after all, who is better placed to make predictions about economic recovery that the businesses who are themselves striving to move forward?</p>
<p>One sobering thought though.  Our survey also found that over 50% of the business population felt <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>none</strong></span> of the political parties could be trusted to manage economic recovery.  Politicians of all colours need to get re-engaged with the UK&#8217;s wealth creation community, whoever wins on May 6th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/election-special-labours-bad-for-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Marketing Lobby &#8211; Time for Change</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/the-marketing-lobby-time-for-change</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/the-marketing-lobby-time-for-change#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindsell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We Think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-channel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most industries are well organised to have their interests effectively  represented to parliament, government and the EU.  Chemicals,  pharmaceuticals, utilities, retail, telecoms, the much vilified banking  sector&#8230;  it is difficult to think of an industry that does not have  its trade association robustly ensuring that its collective voice is  heard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most industries are well organised to have their interests effectively  represented to parliament, government and the EU.  Chemicals,  pharmaceuticals, utilities, retail, telecoms, the much vilified banking  sector&#8230;  it is difficult to think of an industry that does not have  its trade association robustly ensuring that its collective voice is  heard in the halls of power.  Except, that is, the marketing industry.</p>
<p>Our sector seems to have an extraordinary propensity for internicine  squabbles, and a highly developed talent for being unable to see the  wood for the trees.  Part of the issue has to be that our trade bodies  are hugely fragmented into a series of subcategories &#8211; sales promotion,  advertising, direct marketing, digital marketing, live events, and so  on.  These are all largely the result of a yesteryear situation where  different media were competing for the same above-the-line media spend.   Yet are we not now living in a converged world? The majority of  campaigns and customer management strategies are now conceived &#8211;  media-wise &#8211; as multi-channel.   So the old  negotiating position,  pitting media against one another in a largely false  &#8216;either/or&#8217; fight,  is rapidly becoming a thing of the past.  Therefore, a fragmented set of  trade associations makes no sense, even from a practical point of view.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time the marketing industry had a single body to represent its  interests.  None currently exists.  There would be no point in an  existing body like the IPA or the DMA taking over the whole marketing  scene &#8211; their single issue past (and frankly flabby track-record on  effective lobbying), would not help present a holistic image.  So a new  group is needed, possibly a federated concern of which existing  associations make up the subgroups.</p>
<p>Getting agreement that such a body should exist is probably not going to  be too difficult.  Getting co-operation between the egoistic heads of  trade associations may be a little more challenging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/the-marketing-lobby-time-for-change/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bellwether revelant?</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/is-bellwether-relevant</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/is-bellwether-relevant#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindsell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We Think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kb-client-preview.co.uk/lindsell_marketing/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Marketing budgets are still in decline but optimism and confidence is growing according to the latest IPA/BDO Bellwether report.  So says Marketing Week’s report on the latest prognosis on our industry.  DM and online are up.  All else is down.  Yet is the main statistical survey on marketing’s barometer becoming rapidly redundant?
If we keep the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Marketing budgets are still in decline but optimism and confidence is growing according to the latest IPA/BDO Bellwether report.  So says <a title="Marketing Week" href="http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/3008770.article#&amp;nl=BN&amp;ln=15011001" target="_blank">Marketing Week’s </a>report on the latest prognosis on our industry.  DM and online are up.  All else is down.  Yet is the main statistical survey on marketing’s barometer becoming rapidly redundant?</p>
<p>If we keep the analysis of the marketing industry’s health focused on traditional silos, then we will learn nothing.  What does the category of direct marketing now mean?  Is a DM campaign that drives web traffic categorised as direct marketing, or online?  How do we compartmentalise an online campaign that is designed to pull people into an event?</p>
<p>The task is not an easy one.  The various traditional marketing techniques are being combined in many interesting and productive ways.  Few of which fit neatly into Bellwether categories.  Does that mean that Bellwether’s measurement is redundant?  No.  But the barometer of our industry needs to morph with the times, at least with some covering notes about these imaginative media combinations.</p>
<p>In truth, marketing and sales are the recognisable big categories that are coming together.  Indeed, a PR campaign now may be the principal driver of a sales initiative.  Too long have silos of technique determined how we are measured.  And this does not help professional buyers understand how they can really be benefiting from our services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/we-think/is-bellwether-relevant/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Lindsell – Managing Director</title>
		<link>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/who-we-are/paul-lindsell-managing-director</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/who-we-are/paul-lindsell-managing-director#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindsell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Who We Are]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kb-client-preview.co.uk/lindsell_marketing/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managing Director Paul Lindsell brings over 20 years experience in marketing to the Lindsell team and the work they do for clients.  From his beginnings as the Art Fund&#8217;s first public relations officer, followed by a firm grounding in commercial agencies, Paul set up Lindsell Marketing at the age of 29.
Over the last 15 years, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/PaulLindsell04.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-137 alignright" title="Paul Lindsell - Managing Director" src="http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/PaulLindsell04-300x200.jpg" alt="Paul Lindsell - Managing Director" width="200" height="133" /></a>Managing Director Paul Lindsell brings over 20 years experience in marketing to the Lindsell team and the work they do for clients.  From his beginnings as the Art Fund&#8217;s first public relations officer, followed by a firm grounding in commercial agencies, Paul set up Lindsell Marketing at the age of 29.</p>
<p>Over the last 15 years, supported by his senior colleagues, Paul has steered the transformation of the company towards a multi-discipline marketing organisation that is firmly focused on delivering hard, measurable results for its clients.  Paul leads the company, but plays a directorial and advisory role in each client account.  He also leads the company&#8217;s activities in market research, strategic consultancy and digital marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindsellmarketing.com/index.php/who-we-are/paul-lindsell-managing-director/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
